Persuasive Essay on Electoral Colleges free essay sample

In the United States, we are all guaranteed one vote per person. Everyone has an equal voice in electing the people that serve in the government. Every four years during the month of November, citizens of America go to the polls to vote for a president and vice-president of the United States. Am I right? Not really. They actually vote for electors that then vote for our president. It makes me wonder, Are we really a democracy? Having the Electoral College defeats its purpose. First of all, I would like to bring your attention to the many votes that dont even get counted. The way the whole Electoral College thing works is that each state is allowed a certain number of electors who vote for the president. The electors vote is based on the states popular vote. After the state verifies the votes, the candidate that receives the most votes gets all of that states electors votes. We will write a custom essay sample on Persuasive Essay on Electoral Colleges or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Because the states constitution awards electoral votes that way, the innumerable individual votes become meaningless. Does that sound fair to you? Secondly, did you agree with election 2000? I mean, the wrong president won the election. Gore received 500,000 more votes than Bush. But, who won the election? Bush. All because of a policy called the Electoral College. It was a very controversial issue. I know that many people were unhappy about that election. Finally, these consequences go far beyond simple fairness issues. Too many times in American history the Electoral College has single-handedly defeated the purpose of democracy in our country. Since the first presidential election, there have been more than a dozen instances in which somebody has been elected president without a majority of the votes. For example: Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton, and George Bush. I think the best way to change this 200-year-old system is to start off slow. Test out a new system in a smaller election and then, eventually, it will catch on; changing the national policy.